It has come to my attention that, while I have been away, Sput has turned from Sput into USER REMOVED.
This is a shocking development and I demand an explanation from one of the elite members.
Shocking Developments
-
Charlie Wells
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Tue 02 Nov, 2004 16.23
- Location: Cambridgeshire
See: http://www.metropol247.co.uk/forum/view ... start=1430
To summarise things, Mr Brass was apparently removed by management, and the matter is currently in the hands of lawyers.
To summarise things, Mr Brass was apparently removed by management, and the matter is currently in the hands of lawyers.
"If ass holes could fly then this place would be an airport."
-
onetrickpony
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Sat 07 Oct, 2006 14.39
Is that the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? Because i was once told their was a secret forum 
I don't think that's the case.Charlie Wells wrote:See: http://www.metropol247.co.uk/forum/view ... start=1430
To summarise things, Mr Brass was apparently removed by management, and the matter is currently in the hands of lawyers.
What I don't understand is, since what happened didn't happen *on Metropol*, why is Metropol involved?
-
Charlie Wells
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Tue 02 Nov, 2004 16.23
- Location: Cambridgeshire
It's Metropol/Gavin's lawyers which are involved. Until Gavin is able to make a statement I doubt we'll know the full/basic story of what events, though presumably it is fairly serious of lawyers to be involved.cdd wrote:I don't think that's the case.Charlie Wells wrote:See: http://www.metropol247.co.uk/forum/view ... start=1430
To summarise things, Mr Brass was apparently removed by management, and the matter is currently in the hands of lawyers.
What I don't understand is, since what happened didn't happen *on Metropol*, why is Metropol involved?
"If ass holes could fly then this place would be an airport."
The thing is, Sput was one of the (increasingly few) members who I really liked on here. So I'm surprised that he is in some kind of trouble. Without knowing what has happened it's not possible to give a view (not that it would be wanted!) but given how overall friendly and nice a person he has always been on this board his alleged recent behaviour is inconsistent, to say the least, and if it has not already been attempted I would hope Metropol would look for a leinient or forgiving explanation.
Surely we are not so litigious that we must involve lawyers to deal heavy-handedly with a member who has been nothing but good-natured, cheerful and (to non-trolls) courteous over the last few years?
Surely we are not so litigious that we must involve lawyers to deal heavy-handedly with a member who has been nothing but good-natured, cheerful and (to non-trolls) courteous over the last few years?
