Foot and mouth!

Stuart*
Banned
Posts: 2150
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 10.31
Location: Devon

miss hellfire wrote:If i come back as a fresian, i'm gonna be a bullemic one. The less meat on my bones the less likely i'll end up in a bun.
Not in a bun no, but bulking out Mouse or Oscar's food or worse still in a tube of glue! :shock:
User removed
User avatar
rob
Posts: 1079
Joined: Sat 06 Sep, 2003 12.01
Location: Overton, Hampshire
Contact:

Some of the footpaths that cross the Laverstoke Park estate close to where I live have been closed. There are notices referring to a Foot and Mouth Control Zone. I think a real Foot and Mouth Control Zone would be where the disease has actually occurred.

The notices say that the closures are supported by the parish council and the police. It will be interesting to read the minutes of the relevant parish council meeting - if they really have discussed it. The parish council's powers in this matter probably don't extend beyond expressing an opinion. As for the police, they would certainly have the power to enforce closures at a genuine Control Zone, but this isn't one.

It's entirely understandable for a farmer with a large number of animals to be worried about a disease as serious as foot and mouth, and for his employees to be worried too. We have a system where DEFRA, the government department involved, can take decisions to set up control zones where necessary. There are probably many farmers who would like wider restrictions on access to the countryside - what if they all started trying to set up "control zones" and prevent access? There'd be some who wanted to start closing roads as well. Large-scale restrictions have effects on other countryside businesses and activities, as we found six years ago.

If there is a real, official control zone everyone should respect it, and no-one should say "I've a right to go there whenever I want." But until then I don't think a landowner should be claiming to have set one up to prevent access, or to have official support of a kind which I very much doubt can be offered.
Weekdays from 4pm-7pm on Andover Radio
Overton Radio: Weekdays 2pm-4pm, Weekends 8am-10am
Spencer For Hire
Posts: 433
Joined: Tue 24 Aug, 2004 17.47
Location: From The North

Jake wrote:
Ronnie Rowlands wrote:I mean death wise. People go crazy and yes people do lose money, but in the end, there is no big ecidemic.
Thousands of cows were slaughtered due to the 2001 F&M outbreak.
Without wanting to sound facetious, they weren't otherwise going to die of old age.
Stuart*
Banned
Posts: 2150
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 10.31
Location: Devon

Spencer For Hire wrote:
Jake wrote:
Ronnie Rowlands wrote:I mean death wise. People go crazy and yes people do lose money, but in the end, there is no big ecidemic.
Thousands of cows were slaughtered due to the 2001 F&M outbreak.
Without wanting to sound facetious, they weren't otherwise going to die of old age.
Spencer - do you know the real meaning of the word "facetious" I doubt it given your liberal use of the word.

You forget, no doubt to your dissatisfaction, that not all animals are reared or maintained purely for slaughter.

My sister runs a sanctuary for goats, pigs, sheep and other animals that would have no where else to live out their natural lives. F&M causes havoc, she cannot pick up aminals that are in distress simply because of the DEFRA regulations.

This isn't all about the food on your plate on a sunday afternoon you know!
User removed
wells
Posts: 747
Joined: Sun 31 Jul, 2005 14.52

And this is his sisters website created by Stu himself.
http://www.thegoatsanctuary.org
Stuart*
Banned
Posts: 2150
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 10.31
Location: Devon

wells wrote:And this is his sisters website created by Stu himself.
http://www.thegoatsanctuary.org
Actually the dog did it - hence the copyright "OscarPlymouth"

He's not had the claws to update it recently though! Lazy mutt :shock:
User removed
Spencer For Hire
Posts: 433
Joined: Tue 24 Aug, 2004 17.47
Location: From The North

StuartPlymouth wrote:
Spencer For Hire wrote: Without wanting to sound facetious, they weren't otherwise going to die of old age.
Spencer - do you know the real meaning of the word "facetious" I doubt it given your liberal use of the word.

You forget, no doubt to your dissatisfaction, that not all animals are reared or maintained purely for slaughter.

My sister runs a sanctuary for goats, pigs, sheep and other animals that would have no where else to live out their natural lives. F&M causes havoc, she cannot pick up aminals that are in distress simply because of the DEFRA regulations.

This isn't all about the food on your plate on a sunday afternoon you know!
I think you're taking me slightly too seriously. And yes, admittedly 'glib' would have been a better term to use.
Please Respond