DJGM wrote:
No! User Agent Spoofing is most definitely NOT the way to go.
I agree with you 100%, but I was merely highlighting that someone has written a tool which can spoof the user agent, if this is what the user wants.
However, let's look at the case of NatWest OnLine Banking (and RBS Digital Banking). This service is infamous for blocking Mozilla. What should use the customers of NatWest OnLine Banking do?
a. Visit the site in Internet Explorer - not suitable, considering that many people use Mozilla in the first place because of their dislike of IE (or use of another OS)
b. Close their bank account - do you honestly believe that the average user is going to close their bank account and move to another bank just because NatWest doesn't like the User-Agent string sent?
c. Spoof the user agent - in an ideal world should never be done.
d. Use their local branch/telephone banking instead - defeats the purpose of signing up for Internet banking
I am not (intentionally) trying to promote user agent spoofing, but in some cases, what other real alternatives do NatWest customers (and others) have? All they can do is complain as much as they can in the hope that something is done.
DJGM wrote:If a website is blocking your Mozilla based browser, and/or
says it requires the use of Internet Explorer, you should file a Tech Evangelism bug report at
BugZilla,
I take it that the visitors should also
complain to the site involved?
DJGM wrote:instead of making your browser tell fibs to webservers, masquerading as something it isn't. UA Spoofing causes inaccurate browser stats on webserver logs, and therefore persuades dumbass web developers to continue blocking non-Microsoft browsers.
Of course, you could always spoof the user agent, take a screenshot and sent it to the webmaster to prove your point... this is about the only way I feel User Agent spoofing should be used for most sites.