Jamez: The New Victim?

Lorns · Tue 20 Sep, 2005 16.21

Gavin Scott wrote:
Jamez wrote:I wish Ison would just admit that he was Bones and Dusty.
Even if he *wasn't* either of them?

I suppose I could reveal who Dusty was.

Please do Gavin. He was kind of amusing in a creepy, unnerving way. I'm pretty certain Dusty. J and Bones are the same person.

Jamez · Tue 20 Sep, 2005 17.25

Yes, please do tell.

It's obviously someone who's seriously fucked up in the head - especially with the dead babies comment.

babyben · Tue 20 Sep, 2005 18.38

Gavin Scott wrote:
babyben wrote:
Gavin Scott wrote: Even if he *wasn't* either of them?

I suppose I could reveal who Dusty was.
You could, or just keep us all in suspenders.
Oh you saucebottle.

C'mere and I'll whisper it in your ear.

Ooh go on then 8)

Ant · Tue 20 Sep, 2005 18.47

I think everyone would forgive Jamez if he made another mock...

Oh just noticed there is one coming, I wait in suspense.

Oh and Gavin, please do tell. I would be very intrigued to find out.

Gavin Scott · Tue 20 Sep, 2005 18.59

My goodness, I have piqued your collective interest.

I think I may just wait for the dust to settle before the reveal; even though that means I don't get to whisper in Ben's ear.

Anyway, as for "sick in the head"; well one could certainly argue that - but I'm not sure dead baby comments are any worse than accusing a child of sexually pleasuring his father. Both comments were, I am sure, made in jest - and far be it from me to say what is funny and what is not.

Should anyone want an ear-whisper NOT containing Dusty's alias, please let me know.

I reserve the right to kiss the nicest ones.

iSon · Tue 20 Sep, 2005 21.06

Gavin Scott wrote:My goodness, I have piqued your collective interest.

I think I may just wait for the dust to settle before the reveal; even though that means I don't get to whisper in Ben's ear.

Anyway, as for "sick in the head"; well one could certainly argue that - but I'm not sure dead baby comments are any worse than accusing a child of sexually pleasuring his father. Both comments were, I am sure, made in jest - and far be it from me to say what is funny and what is not.

Should anyone want an ear-whisper NOT containing Dusty's alias, please let me know.

I reserve the right to kiss the nicest ones.

Oh go on then...

but I'd LOVE to know who Dusty was as well...

babyben · Tue 20 Sep, 2005 22.26

Gavin Scott wrote:My goodness, I have piqued your collective interest.

I think I may just wait for the dust to settle before the reveal; even though that means I don't get to whisper in Ben's ear.

Anyway, as for "sick in the head"; well one could certainly argue that - but I'm not sure dead baby comments are any worse than accusing a child of sexually pleasuring his father. Both comments were, I am sure, made in jest - and far be it from me to say what is funny and what is not.

Should anyone want an ear-whisper NOT containing Dusty's alias, please let me know.

I reserve the right to kiss the nicest ones.

Oooooh I feel used and abused (ahem), you whispered sweet nothings in my ear for so long and then you don't tell me! Ooh the shame!

Gavin Scott · Tue 20 Sep, 2005 23.04

Now wash your hands.

And to the myriad members who have written in private: I have announced the name of the user known as Dusty in the secret forum.

Naturally, passing access urls to non initiates of this forum is strictly prohibited, as is laid out in the contract you signed. Failure to comply will result in your local unbundled loop being disconnected.

Nick Harvey · Tue 20 Sep, 2005 23.22

Gavin Scott wrote:I have announced the name of the user known as Dusty in the secret forum.

All noted.

<wink, wink>

babyben · Tue 20 Sep, 2005 23.37

Hand Washed.

If I'm honest, I don't really care who it was really.

James Martin · Wed 21 Sep, 2005 01.13

How does one access the Secret Forum?