The demise of pleasant avatars

Chris Turnbull · Tue 13 Sep, 2005 22.53

Gavin Scott wrote:It would be nice for more members to have avatars; however I should probably remind users that avatars should be face pictures only

does mine coun't gavin, seeing as it is a picture of me (well a graphical *South park-ish* representative of me).

Gavin Scott · Tue 13 Sep, 2005 23.03

I'm afraid you are also subject to the Rules I am charged with upholding, Chris.

Otherwise.. wrath.. yadda yadda.

Chris Turnbull · Tue 13 Sep, 2005 23.16

Gavin Scott wrote:I'm afraid you are also subject to the Rules I am charged with upholding, Chris.

Otherwise.. wrath.. yadda yadda.

OK, how about my old one?

Gavin Scott · Tue 13 Sep, 2005 23.34

Half-faces will do at a push.

Sput · Tue 13 Sep, 2005 23.38

Gavin Scott wrote:Half-faces will do at a push.

Awww I like his south park style one - it does have a resemblence after all!

Gavin Scott · Tue 13 Sep, 2005 23.58

Sput wrote:
Gavin Scott wrote:Half-faces will do at a push.
Awww I like his south park style one - it does have a resemblence after all!

By that standard then perhaps mine should be this:

whilst James Martin would be this:

I'm sorry, sweetpea, it just won't work.

Sput · Wed 14 Sep, 2005 00.04

Gavin Scott wrote:

Well can I at least squeeze your bicep?

Gavin Scott · Wed 14 Sep, 2005 00.07

Sput · Wed 14 Sep, 2005 00.11

Gavin Scott wrote:Yip.

Wait just one second there sonnyjim! That's not your bicep IS IT!

Gavin Scott · Wed 14 Sep, 2005 00.13

Nope.

Pete · Wed 14 Sep, 2005 00.13

jsut because he has a radiator on his head he gets to play with your biceps - it's so unfair gav