U&Gold is failing badly

MoeTheMan2025
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri 10 Oct, 2025 18.12

I say this because of its schedule being hardly different any day. LOADS of shows available but they only repeat OFAH. How about you repeat the dozen other shows in your archives. I can see why Citizen Khan won't, but I'm gobsmacked they favour Not Going Out to Two Doors Down. The Jelly ident is disgusting. The channel needs to go all out and get new idents.
Martin Phillp
Posts: 1579
Joined: Wed 11 May, 2011 01.28

Like radio, the smaller channels that work successfully are those that have a select amount of shows on heavy rotation. OFAH works for U&Gold and has been in their top 10 shows for years.

Unlike Rewind TV or That's TV which seem to acquire a series of some obscure show that hasn't been shown for 40 years for good reason is then replaced with something else equally obscure, U&Gold schedules largely classic sitcoms and the odd commission that suits the brand rather than going straight to the bargain bin of shows.
TVF's London Lite.
MoeTheMan2025
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri 10 Oct, 2025 18.12

Martin Phillp wrote: Fri 10 Oct, 2025 21.11 Like radio, the smaller channels that work successfully are those that have a select amount of shows on heavy rotation. OFAH works for U&Gold and has been in their top 10 shows for years.

Unlike Rewind TV or That's TV which seem to acquire a series of some obscure show that hasn't been shown for 40 years for good reason is then replaced with something else equally obscure, U&Gold schedules largely classic sitcoms and the odd commission that suits the brand rather than going straight to the bargain bin of shows.
Which, believe it or not, is nonsense. The commissions are common, but have they really remembered they have a back catalogue? Not to mention that's not even all of the point.
Dr Lobster*
Posts: 2130
Joined: Sat 30 Aug, 2003 20.14

Gold used to be decent background TV but you got streaming services now, I do wonder just how many people are watching the broadcast channels of a day… it can’t be many , surely?
Please Respond