Exactly, the coverage itself has been incredibly high quality, barring a few hiccups - I'm finding that there is much more emphasis on analysis than previously, which is incredibly interesting. But it's ridiculous how they all seem to be overlooking this and branding it a failure because the graphics aren't the greatest and they can't seen to acknowledge that the primary purpose of a news channel is to broadcast news.all new Phil wrote: ↑Tue 25 Apr, 2023 12.08 It’s frustrating because for those of us who - you know - actually want to watch good quality news coverage, the channel is much better now than it was before. They’ve reworked the entire way the channel operates, and things are properly explained and analysed. They’ve had to fit this new format into their existing presentation, albeit temporarily, which is why some bits don’t look quite right, but Christ, I wish people would look at the bigger picture rather than catastrophise because sometimes they use an old title sequence depending on which studio they’re using.
Pres Cafe Watch News and Information Board
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue 07 Apr, 2020 15.03
Indeed the hiring of Caitriona Perry to be their Washington anchor is another great move. But they would prefer a culture war debate hosted by Martine Croxall with Owen Jomes versus Sonia Sodha instead.AlfieMulcahy wrote: ↑Sun 30 Apr, 2023 13.55Exactly, the coverage itself has been incredibly high quality, barring a few hiccups - I'm finding that there is much more emphasis on analysis than previously, which is incredibly interesting. But it's ridiculous how they all seem to be overlooking this and branding it a failure because the graphics aren't the greatest and they can't seen to acknowledge that the primary purpose of a news channel is to broadcast news.all new Phil wrote: ↑Tue 25 Apr, 2023 12.08 It’s frustrating because for those of us who - you know - actually want to watch good quality news coverage, the channel is much better now than it was before. They’ve reworked the entire way the channel operates, and things are properly explained and analysed. They’ve had to fit this new format into their existing presentation, albeit temporarily, which is why some bits don’t look quite right, but Christ, I wish people would look at the bigger picture rather than catastrophise because sometimes they use an old title sequence depending on which studio they’re using.
-
- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sun 13 Feb, 2005 00.04
- Location: Next door to Hell
It’s fun how the sizeable contingent who seem to be pushing us to dislike these new arrangements are complaining about a sizeable contingent who seems to be really pushing us to like and support them.
Slightly surprised nobody over there seems to have noticed clean versions of all this year's Eurovision beds being played out in full during the week. Would have expected that to be dream content for the requests forum in previous times.
Where's this sorry?
"He has to be larger than bacon"
The TikTok meet and greet sessions this week used this year's beds as filler between the interviews - all three variations got a lot of air time. All the country specific heart graphics were also shown, which appear prominently in a lot of the broadcast graphic elements.