

IT must be said ED wont be in the pocket of Alex, since Trident will go thourgh since the Tories would vote for it, I bet some other stuff would get past thanks to the Tories.
You do tend to proclaim things as absolute facts when actually there's a lot of unknowns in the equation. Just a casual observation.barcode wrote:IT must be said ED wont be in the pocket of Alex, since Trident will go thourgh since the Tories would vote for it, I bet some other stuff would get past thanks to the Tories.
Really?Gavin Scott wrote:You do tend to proclaim things as absolute facts when actually there's a lot of unknowns in the equation. Just a casual observation.barcode wrote:IT must be said ED wont be in the pocket of Alex, since Trident will go thourgh since the Tories would vote for it, I bet some other stuff would get past thanks to the Tories.
By which I mean stop it.
Labour has now pledged to renew it: http://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/ ... 1425829624Nicola Sturgeon has dropped demands that a minority Labour government must cancel a new Trident nuclear weapon in return for the Scottish National party’s backing at Westminster.
Neither newspaper columns nor party pledges mean anything at the moment - not enough to be categoric on any subject. "Trident will go through" being an example. 75% of Labour candidates do not support its renewal - and if it goes to a free vote it could be scuppered. The arithmetic will be all important - but even knowing it doesn't guarantee outcomes.barcode wrote:This does mean Labour would try and push throw a new trident deal and you would be draft not to believe the tories supporting the bill to get it though.
Unless your comment was about my comment about ed wont being in Alex pocket?
barcode wrote:I've notice a number of website and people make predictions about who are most likely to win this election. Its becoming very big business it seems.
* http://electionsetc.com/
* http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/homepage.html
* http://ukgeneralelection2015.blogspot.co.uk/
* http://www.election2015.co.uk/
* http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general ... -know.html
It seems the Telegraph are the only ones making since, No one can state anything until after the scottish ref vote, because if Scotland leaves the Tories are going to win. Mind you the Guardain would make you think otherwise.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre ... l-election
What other peoples views on the outcome or are there any big factors which will come into play?
Its true if Labour plus SNP/Pyaid and greens have more seats than the government how is that UN-democratic? Tories can't have it both ways, either kept the union and the mps up north, or get rid.This kind of language causes despair among Tories north of the border who fear that the party in London is waltzing into an SNP trap.
They know that many voters in Scotland will read the phrase "democratic will of the British people" and hear "democratic will of the English people".
Because, if it is illegitimate for Scottish MPs, from whatever party, to vote against one government and support another in the British parliament, then what, voters may ask, is the point of the union?
Who is dancing to Mr Salmond's tune now?