TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
I've just gone and sent ginofish a message to his user on Metropol, explaining my intense dislike for him, and also why he annoys so many other people. I've been on a short fuse, with projects at work, and looking at his current attitude where he attempts to be all high and mighty, and also like he is untouchable and can do as he please, including coming up with idiotic Rotas and ideas of how he would run ITV1, along with idiotic spelling.
I'm very sorry to hear about your frustrations with your current projects and I hope that they work out for you in the end. However I have not received your Message accept for one on TV Forum telling me to check my Metropol mail which is empty. I am very sorry that you feel this way and sorry for anything that I may have done to mount up your short fuse. I will take what you have said on board and I hope in future posts this is reflected in my posts.Critique wrote:I've just gone and sent ginofish a message to his user on Metropol, explaining my intense dislike for him, and also why he annoys so many other people. I've been on a short fuse, with projects at work, and looking at his current attitude where he attempts to be all high and mighty, and also like he is untouchable and can do as he please, including coming up with idiotic Rotas and ideas of how he would run ITV1, along with idiotic spelling.
I'm very sorry to hear about your frustrations with your current projects and I hope that they work out for you in the end. However I have not received your Message accept for one on TV Forum telling me to check my Metropol mail which is empty. I am very sorry that you feel this way and sorry for anything that I may have done to mount up your short fuse. I will take what you have said on board and I hope in future posts this is reflected in my posts.Critique wrote:I've just gone and sent ginofish a message to his user on Metropol, explaining my intense dislike for him, and also why he annoys so many other people. I've been on a short fuse, with projects at work, and looking at his current attitude where he attempts to be all high and mighty, and also like he is untouchable and can do as he please, including coming up with idiotic Rotas and ideas of how he would run ITV1, along with idiotic spelling.
It's except you dolt.ginofish wrote:I'm very sorry to hear about your frustrations with your current projects and I hope that they work out for you in the end. However I have not received your Message accept for one on TV Forum telling me to check my Metropol mail which is empty. I am very sorry that you feel this way and sorry for anything that I may have done to mount up your short fuse. I will take what you have said on board and I hope in future posts this is reflected in my posts.Critique wrote:I've just gone and sent ginofish a message to his user on Metropol, explaining my intense dislike for him, and also why he annoys so many other people. I've been on a short fuse, with projects at work, and looking at his current attitude where he attempts to be all high and mighty, and also like he is untouchable and can do as he please, including coming up with idiotic Rotas and ideas of how he would run ITV1, along with idiotic spelling.
We do not need to read the result of every clunking cog churning out needless sparks and steam from your already overworked, run down, clapped out hunk of garbage residing somewhere deep inside your skull every time you watch sodding Daybreak. It's just an average breakfast TV show which just about does the job it's designed to; it does not necessitate Tumble Tower-esque levels of sodding bloggery from your keyboard every day, and certainly not 104 pages of TV Forum, of which I expect 70-80%-worth could have been easily negated had you not decided to have a four-month spate of synaptic diarrhoea. If you really want to talk shit about Daybreak every day, do it on your own website and stop polluting ours with your own inimitable style - inimitable because no-one frankly should even look at what you write with any sort of respect.
*Claps* I think we all agree in a sense on that post. As for not receiving the message... It has been sent, so unless you've gone deleting before you've been reading I don't know why you wouldn't have got it.It's except you dolt.ginofish wrote:
I'm very sorry to hear about your frustrations with your current projects and I hope that they work out for you in the end. However I have not received your Message accept for one on TV Forum telling me to check my Metropol mail which is empty. I am very sorry that you feel this way and sorry for anything that I may have done to mount up your short fuse. I will take what you have said on board and I hope in future posts this is reflected in my posts.
We do not need to read the result of every clunking cog churning out needless sparks and steam from your already overworked, run down, clapped out hunk of garbage residing somewhere deep inside your skull every time you watch sodding Daybreak. It's just an average breakfast TV show which just about does the job it's designed to; it does not necessitate Tumble Tower-esque levels of sodding bloggery from your keyboard every day, and certainly not 104 pages of TV Forum, of which I expect 70-80%-worth could have been easily negated had you not decided to have a four-month spate of synaptic diarrhoea. If you really want to talk shit about Daybreak every day, do it on your own website and stop polluting ours with your own inimitable style - inimitable because no-one frankly should even look at what you write with any sort of respect.
Or you could have not sent rightly?Critique wrote:ginofish wrote:
*Claps* I think we all agree in a sense on that post. As for not receiving the message... It has been sent, so unless you've gone deleting before you've been reading I don't know why you wouldn't have got it.
- Gavin Scott
- Admin
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.16
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
"Rightly" isn't a word. You mean, "correctly".ginofish wrote:Or you could have not sent rightly?
Daniel, one of the criticisms of you is that you post about Daybreak almost every single day - and in fact I've just clicked over and there you are again saying, "thought it was a very good show today...".
I'm sorry to be so blunt, but who cares? I'm not really interested if you thought it was a good show today, yesterday or tomorrow.
If you had something distinctive to say - either about a specific moment in the show or one of the presenters, then that would be fine I'm sure; but this is just droning, white noise of what YOU like, and its really not very interesting or enlightening to anyone.
I mean - don't you get that?
I like turkey and cheese toasties for my lunch in the office - how many days in a row would you like me to say that before you got bored? Wouldn't you be telling me to write it in a diary instead after a week?
You say that you want to take things on board from the criticism - but that's all hollow talk unless you actually DO IT.
Please, PLEASE, just take a break from posting about the fact that you like Daybreak, and leave your observations until you've got something interesting to say. Interesting to the other readers - not just you.
Hello Gavin, In relation to today’s post the interesting thing in my post was in relation to the absence of some of the presenting team this week Both Main presenters, Both weather presenters and the Newsreader are off so ITV have made some choices to fill these gaps. Unlike BBC Breakfast and Sunrise which both have established formats that do not change Daybreak has changed things many times since its launch earlier this year. And I like to give my reaction to these things however I do understand were you coming from however the reason I often don’t take much of this on board is the amount of criticism members seem to give and Immutably mix this in with at times quite mean jokes about me which I do not like. Even at times when I have not made any posts people are making jokes.Gavin Scott wrote:"Rightly" isn't a word. You mean, "correctly".ginofish wrote:Or you could have not sent rightly?
Daniel, one of the criticisms of you is that you post about Daybreak almost every single day - and in fact I've just clicked over and there you are again saying, "thought it was a very good show today...".
I'm sorry to be so blunt, but who cares? I'm not really interested if you thought it was a good show today, yesterday or tomorrow.
If you had something distinctive to say - either about a specific moment in the show or one of the presenters, then that would be fine I'm sure; but this is just droning, white noise of what YOU like, and its really not very interesting or enlightening to anyone.
I mean - don't you get that?
I like turkey and cheese toasties for my lunch in the office - how many days in a row would you like me to say that before you got bored? Wouldn't you be telling me to write it in a diary instead after a week?
You say that you want to take things on board from the criticism - but that's all hollow talk unless you actually DO IT.
Please, PLEASE, just take a break from posting about the fact that you like Daybreak, and leave your observations until you've got something interesting to say. Interesting to the other readers - not just you.
I will in future only share my observations when there is something which I think others may find Interesting.
And it is very intresting to herar about your lunch I like Jacket Potatos.
Maybe this is a sign?ginofish wrote:And I like to give my reaction to these things however I do understand were you coming from however the reason I often don’t take much of this on board is the amount of criticism members seem to give
On a more serious note, maybe you should create a Daybreak Presenters and Rota's thread for you and the other kids to keep your schedules up to date and complain about nobodies like Katy Hill. Then the sensible discussion about ratings, sets, graphics and the running of the programme can be kept for the grown ups without your constant wittering.
Oh, and while I'm feeling helpful. Stop posting. Read back what you've written. Properly - no, start again, from the beginning. Right, read it through. Ok - you see that sentence, you know, that one with fifty words where three would do, trim it down. Right, carry on, next paragraph, is that even English? It has English words, but they're not in the right order, sort them out. Carry on until you've read the whole post, then read it through again, this time making sure it makes sense, and reflects what you want to post. Finally, read it through again, and think about what the most sarcastic hurtful comments you will get for what you've said. If after all those reviews, you think you've got something worth sharing with the world, go ahead, hit the Post button.
Discussion forum's aren't a race. There's time to craft a reply. You can even make a cup of tea hal...
...fway through writing it. Just bashing your head on the keyboard until roughly the right words fall onto your screen just makes you seem like a cretin, which tends to wind people up. You can get away with it if your posts are valuable, amusing or informative. Your's are currently just opinion pieces which most people don't want to read anyway, so basically, make it readable, or shut up.
If you really feel the need to tell everybody about your opinion on how Tasmin is good presenter, and she didn't fluff her lines once, but you compile a load of twonk to tell us about it, at least make sure it adds something to the conversation. If what you add to the thread is bad spelling, and a view that many people have already shared, don't post it.
Here is an example of what an acceptable post from you could look like, fresh with corrections from a post from the Daybreak thread you posted in earlier.
Here is an example of what an acceptable post from you could look like, fresh with corrections from a post from the Daybreak thread you posted in earlier.
That was your post, here's the modified, acceptable post:ginofish wrote:Thought it was a very good show today nice to see regional talent being used we've had Pip from TT/Border , Lucy from Central, Fred from my region and Andrea from Wales.
Dan was good today and I noticed he was doing the sport whilst presenting the main show.
One last point, don't assume we know where you are, so telling us that Fred from your region was on wasn't very helpful. If you write a load of drivel, we won't bother in scrolling back up to read your region.ginofish wrote:I thought it was a very good show today, and nice to see regional talent being used. We've had Phillipa from Tyne Tees and Border, Lucy from Central, Fred from [insert your region here] and Andrea from Wales.
Dan was good today and I noted he was doing the sport whilst presenting the main show.