The disallowed goal - Could it have turned the match around

James L H
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon 18 May, 2009 18.52
Location: North East

Whats your opinions on the goal that was never to be in the Germany - England match. Do you think technology is needed to stop things like this happening in the future.

Watch here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3onu9ORTrjA
User avatar
marksi
Posts: 1892
Joined: Wed 07 Jan, 2004 05.38
Location: Donaghadee

Football on Metropol. Who'd have thunk it?

Yes, of course. Why not? It's used in other major sports. And it would prevent us listening to England fans giving off for the next 40 years.

Having said that, that goal wasn't borderline, it was clearly and obviously over the line, I knew that without seeing a replay.

Oh and it may prevent "The referee's a wanker" being loudly chanted on BBC ONE on a Sunday afternoon.
Jovis
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri 25 Aug, 2006 20.08

I actually think the game could have ended differently had the goal been allowed.
James L H
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon 18 May, 2009 18.52
Location: North East

Jovis wrote:I actually think the game could have ended differently had the goal been allowed.
You may be right. Thread title changed. At least we don't have to see this ad any more : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjOvTArUqmQ Every cloud has a silver lining. ;)
User avatar
Nick Harvey
God
Posts: 4147
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 22.26
Location: Deepest Wiltshire
Contact:

Jovis wrote:I actually think the game could have ended differently had the goal been allowed.
I agree. We'd have lost 4-2 instead of 4-1.

We'd still have had to come home, though. We'd still have had to sack the silly Italian chap, though.

So differently, but not very differently.

Thank heavens it's over.
User avatar
dosxuk
Posts: 673
Joined: Thu 07 Feb, 2008 21.37
Location: Sheffield

At least we didn't lose 2-1 (or 3-2, 4-3, etc), so the disallowed goal isn't a deciding one. The follow up if it was a deciding goal would have been unbearable.
James L H
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon 18 May, 2009 18.52
Location: North East

dosxuk wrote:At least we didn't lose 2-1 (or 3-2, 4-3, etc), so the disallowed goal isn't a deciding one. The follow up if it was a deciding goal would have been unbearable.
I am sure sky NEWS would have ran with it for weeks, with special graphics and a virtual football pitch. :)
User avatar
GavBelfast
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed 28 Oct, 2009 22.13
Location: Dundonald, Co Down

The English FA helped to put Sepp Blatter where he is, in the mistaken belief that he would give England the World Cup Finals in 2006.

He didn't support England's bid, and he doesn't support goal-line technology either.

Kismet, eh?
Chie
Posts: 979
Joined: Fri 31 Aug, 2007 05.03

The German goalkeeper was *nom*

http://img.skysports.com/09/08/800x600/ ... 346810.jpg

Anyway, England were diabolical and the Germans fully deserved to win. Never mind.
Square Eyes
Posts: 630
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.38

The pound shops will be gutted that they can't shift any more cheap tat with the St. Georges flag on it.

Perhaps they can collect them up from the central reservations of motorways up and down this land in readiness to flog them next time.
Alexia
Posts: 2999
Joined: Sat 01 Oct, 2005 17.50

Nick Harvey wrote:
Jovis wrote:I actually think the game could have ended differently had the goal been allowed.
I agree. We'd have lost 4-2 instead of 4-1.
Agreed. England didn't deserve to win in any shape or form. Abysmal display from a team whose combined wealth could easily ease the poverty in South Africa.
Post Reply