He does add a little spice - he takes a subject and randomly applies one of his core views (ceefax good, Murdoch bad, Grange Hill good, sex bad...) and then sticks by it regardless of any later contradictions.Gavin Scott wrote:Typical Simon Luxton - moans about too much sport and then moans at Sky for keeping it all away from his reach. Its not that he's "full of contradictions" so much as its just he's a bloody idiot.
I'm sure there are plenty of other people that use the same techniques it is just that almost everyone of his core views is outdated/mad that it raises eyebrows. He strikes me as expressing the views of a child - you can imagine his parents relaying a sanitised version of the world to him; and then him never challenging it. Never having a teenage rebellion, or any outlet for challenging (and certainly not changing) his ideas - it shows in his debating style, very simple "i'm right" and anyone who disagrees is wrong, end of.
Very strange.