410 is a very innacurate error to send out for such things

I'd say maybe 406 (Not Acceptable) would be more accurate, 401 (Authorisation) would do I suppose but that implies a login is required.

Flava wrote:Remember Hymagumba was a prominent campaigner to get me back... I'm sure he's slagged IE off much more.

Only to watch you make a tit of yourself again, which you are doing at the moment.

Also Mozilla and Firefox shouldn't be in the same section. Unless this is a poll of rendering engines in which case it should be

> Trident
> Gecko
> Presto
> Tasman
> KHTML....

Neil Jones wrote:How childish.

oh surely not, I didn't mean it to be.

you could turn this into a competition really.

Easy one to start with. Placename near Morpeth in Nortnthumberland
"Ulgham"

At least I don't ram another browser down peeps' throats the moment they complain of a problem with IE! No you ram your radio station down their throat the moment they speak. it doesn't even display Metropol as intended. JM, I have to take issue with this one. You say this over and over again yet I...

Neil Jones wrote:Yeah well our "war" is only on this issue, your "war" spills over into everything else. As your signature proves.

Yes but ours is just *sooooo* much better than yours.

Flava wrote:Think mine was "Wannabe" by the Spice Girls! :S

*chuckle*

DAS wrote:I'm just thinking that bloke doesn't look like a Hannah to me. His parents clearly liked being different.

Looks like a very old and drunk Scott Mills to me.

Niether do yours Neil, it's so tiresome really between you two, It's like me and JM. Anyhoo, on a related note. There has been a security bug found in Mozilla with the Windows shell: protocol. It's been fixed now and can be either gotten by downloading Mozilla 1.7.1, Firefox 0.9.2, Thunderbird 0.7.2...

2gb if I'm not mistaken.

Course neither free service can match google's 1000MB.