dosxuk - My views are based on an 18 month struggle, along with a significant number of other people, to get the BBC to take even the slightest bit of notice of audience opinion. That's an acceptable position for a commercial broadcaster but not for a publicly funded one. With respect, there's a lot...

Could you respond my other point? The answer is, I don’t know. I really don't have the convoluted causality convictions that you all seem to think I do about whatever Jem chose to do or not to do or if that was a ‘conspiracy’ or not. I’m not analysing his behaviour that forensically, although many ...

Sorry Jovis, I didn't notice until just then that I had this gun to your head forcing you to read them.

Short enough for you?

Mozo, I'd like to introduce you to my friend perspective. I don't believe you've met him before, or even sensed him. Get to know him and your life online (and in the real world) may improve. Dr James x Actually Gavin, James makes some good points and it probably won't surprise him to know that I've...

Now you see Jem, that's a PROPER explanation, thank you. Just a shame it took so long and that a BBC employee felt that it wasn't appropriate to respond on a BBC messageboard about use of the BBC logo. Also a shame that when this 'rather dull' question could have been easily settled on the BBC board...

cdd wrote:OK this thread has truly bored me now. i mean there's not much else to say is there?

That is the most sensible thing you've said so far.

Its been real folks. Thanks again.

OH MY FUCKING GOD?!??!!? I can't actually believe you're delving this far into it. You dont have to "take it up" with anybody - do you not have anything more worthwhile to complain about rather than persecuting members of BBC staff? Apparently not. Sorry. You see it as persecuting, I see ...

And he's quite happy for them to be up because AS HE HAS EXPLAINED TO YOU they are an in-joke that any other geeks in similar professions, or anyone working for the BBC in a similar capacity, might find funny. I think you're missing the point here. The term is prejudicial. Its not appropriate to hi...

We're not talking about one photo though are we? There are at least 3 of them and Jem seems to be quite happy for all of them to be taken, posted up and then to stay there for months. I never said you were ALL BBC plants. But lets be honest, at least one of you has to be either working for, or with ...

Of course its conceivable. Its also conceivable that he was the only one that used one and the only one that still has it on his laptop. Its also conceivable that he was the only one to be photographed with it, numerous times. I suppose its also conceivable that he's be the only one to allow the ima...

Thanks for that Jeremy. Sounds really convincing. A bit like the “I was just holding it for someone else officer” or the “I didn’t pack my own bag” defence. Blah blah blah. Congratulations. You've just proven my earlier assertion that "you probably woudn't accept an explanation" correct. ...